Better Vice Club
Find your state's standards
✓ Aligned to published standards in 48 states and Washington, D.C.
Pick your state to see which Better Vice Clubcourses meet which of its published standards: the exact code, the standard's own words, the lesson that covers it, and a link to the source document. Built for teachers, homeschoolers, and administrators; printable and copyable for a state filing.
Prefer one searchable table across every state? Open the standards explorer →
Mapped so far
- Alaska8 standards mapped · 4 fully covered · 4 partially · 3 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Alabama6 standards mapped · 0 fully covered · 6 partially · 2 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Arkansas23 standards mapped · 8 fully covered · 15 partially · 6 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Arizona32 standards mapped · 14 fully covered · 18 partially · 4 frameworksSee the alignment →
- California14 standards mapped · 7 fully covered · 7 partially · 5 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Connecticut7 standards mapped · 5 fully covered · 2 partially · 2 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Washington, D.C.15 standards mapped · 8 fully covered · 7 partially · 3 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Delaware16 standards mapped · 8 fully covered · 8 partially · 3 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Florida19 standards mapped · 12 fully covered · 7 partially · 6 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Georgia18 standards mapped · 8 fully covered · 10 partially · 6 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Hawaii4 standards mapped · 2 fully covered · 2 partially · 2 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Iowa11 standards mapped · 6 fully covered · 5 partially · 2 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Idaho9 standards mapped · 7 fully covered · 2 partially · 2 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Illinois25 standards mapped · 12 fully covered · 13 partially · 7 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Indiana26 standards mapped · 14 fully covered · 12 partially · 6 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Kansas7 standards mapped · 5 fully covered · 2 partially · 2 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Kentucky5 standards mapped · 1 fully covered · 4 partially · 2 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Louisiana6 standards mapped · 0 fully covered · 6 partially · 1 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Massachusetts14 standards mapped · 4 fully covered · 10 partially · 6 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Maryland8 standards mapped · 5 fully covered · 3 partially · 3 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Maine6 standards mapped · 3 fully covered · 3 partially · 3 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Michigan8 standards mapped · 6 fully covered · 2 partially · 3 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Minnesota2 standards mapped · 1 fully covered · 1 partially · 1 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Missouri4 standards mapped · 2 fully covered · 2 partially · 1 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Mississippi6 standards mapped · 3 fully covered · 3 partially · 2 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Montana19 standards mapped · 4 fully covered · 15 partially · 3 frameworksSee the alignment →
- North Carolina12 standards mapped · 1 fully covered · 11 partially · 1 frameworksSee the alignment →
- North Dakota20 standards mapped · 13 fully covered · 7 partially · 5 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Nebraska1 standards mapped · 1 fully covered · 0 partially · 1 frameworksSee the alignment →
- New Hampshire18 standards mapped · 5 fully covered · 13 partially · 5 frameworksSee the alignment →
- New Jersey21 standards mapped · 5 fully covered · 16 partially · 5 frameworksSee the alignment →
- New Mexico21 standards mapped · 8 fully covered · 13 partially · 5 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Nevada20 standards mapped · 6 fully covered · 14 partially · 5 frameworksSee the alignment →
- New York19 standards mapped · 3 fully covered · 16 partially · 7 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Ohio29 standards mapped · 14 fully covered · 15 partially · 7 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Oklahoma11 standards mapped · 3 fully covered · 8 partially · 4 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Oregon6 standards mapped · 3 fully covered · 3 partially · 2 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Pennsylvania17 standards mapped · 3 fully covered · 14 partially · 5 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Rhode Island8 standards mapped · 5 fully covered · 3 partially · 3 frameworksSee the alignment →
- South Dakota3 standards mapped · 1 fully covered · 2 partially · 1 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Tennessee7 standards mapped · 2 fully covered · 5 partially · 3 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Texas27 standards mapped · 17 fully covered · 10 partially · 6 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Utah7 standards mapped · 3 fully covered · 4 partially · 3 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Virginia12 standards mapped · 0 fully covered · 12 partially · 1 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Vermont18 standards mapped · 9 fully covered · 9 partially · 3 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Washington18 standards mapped · 7 fully covered · 11 partially · 5 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Wisconsin5 standards mapped · 3 fully covered · 2 partially · 1 frameworksSee the alignment →
- West Virginia9 standards mapped · 4 fully covered · 5 partially · 2 frameworksSee the alignment →
- Wyoming20 standards mapped · 9 fully covered · 11 partially · 3 frameworksSee the alignment →
How this map is made, and why most states aren't on it yet
We map a state only after fetching its actual standards documents and checking each standard against actual lesson content. Nothing is cited from memory, partial coverage is labelled as loudly as full coverage, and each framework shows the date it was retrieved. That takes time per state, so states appear here as their mapping is verified, not before. The courses themselves work anywhere; only the paperwork mapping is state-by-state.
Not mapped yet
Next in the queue: . Every other state follows the same fetch-then-verify method.
The courses don't wait for the paperwork
Every course publishes its sources and can be used in any state today. The state mapping is what turns “this is good teaching” into “this meets standard X” for a filing.