Skip to content

Better Vice Club

Indiana standards alignment

Designed for high school. Below is every Indianastandard these courses cover: the exact code, the standard's own words, and the lesson that covers it. Where we only cover part of a standard, it says so, and says which part.

12
standards mapped
6
fully covered
6
partially covered
4
frameworks

Read this before you rely on it

  • We mapped this ourselves. This alignment was done by Better Vice Club against the published standards. It has not been reviewed, endorsed, or approved by Indiana's education authority or by anyone else.
  • Every code was fetched, then transcribed word for word. Each framework below shows the date its codes and text were retrieved from the publisher.
  • Standards get revised.A code can be renumbered or its wording changed without notice, and some states publish more than one live edition of the same document. Confirm anything you file against your own jurisdiction's current requirements, using the source links below.
  • We would rather claim less. Where the courses only partly cover a standard, this page says partially covered and explains the gap. Standards we considered and could not honestly claim are listed at the bottom, with the reasons.

Subject

Filtering by course: BVC: Coffee — The Daily Global Connection

Showing 12 standards covered by BVC: Coffee — The Daily Global Connection. Clear filters

Indiana · Social Studies

Indiana Academic Standards: Economics

2026 · Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) · retrieved 2026-07-13

IDOE currently publishes BOTH a 2026 and a 2023 edition of the Economics standards. We cite the 2026 edition because it is the newer of the two — but the text of some standards changed between them (E.1.6 gained “feudal, mercantile”, and Domains 6–8 were renumbered from E.6–E.8 to GE.6–GE.8). Confirm which edition your school year is being held to.

Read the source document →

Indiana · Social Studies

Indiana Academic Standards: Geography and History of the World

2023 · Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) · retrieved 2026-07-13

The current edition IDOE links for this high-school course. This is the course the Commodity Map fits most completely.

Read the source document →

Indiana · English/Language Arts

Indiana Academic Standards: Grades 9-10 English/Language Arts

2023 · Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) · retrieved 2026-07-13

Indiana is not a Common Core state — it repealed its adoption in 2014 and writes its own ELA standards. These codes are Indiana's, and do not match Common Core's.

Read the source document →
  • 9-10.CC.8

    Covered
    Analyze bias in media through the inclusion or exclusion of information and reliability of the source from visual and verbal messages to achieve a desired result.

    Covered by

    • · Ep 1 · Reading a Coffee Ad
    • · Ep 2 · Reading a Tea Ad
    • · Ep 3 · Reading a Chocolate Ad
    • · Ep 4 · Whose Voice Tells the Story (reading a text for what it leaves out)
    • · Ep 11 · Tiki and the Tropical Paradise
    • · Ep 15 · The Language of Doubt
    • · Spotting Misleading Marketing, Lesson 3 · Weasel words and what the fine print takes back
    • · Spotting Misleading Marketing, Lesson 5 · Fake reviews, astroturfing, and undisclosed #ads

    Note: “Inclusion or exclusion of information” is taught by name: Ep 4 teaches reading for absence, using Jane Austen's silence about where the Mansfield Park sugar money comes from, and the marketing course teaches omission, disclosure, and source reliability as everyday consumer skills.

  • 9-10.CC.5

    Partially covered
    Analyze multiple sources of information presented in diverse media and formats while evaluating the credibility and accuracy of each source.

    Covered by

    • · Ep 19 · Peer Review Versus Press Release
    • · Every course's Sources bibliography, with per-claim verification

    What we do and don't cover: Partial: the curriculum models source evaluation constantly and publishes its own bibliography for students to check. But sustained student-run source evaluation is assessed only in the Coffee project.

Indiana · English/Language Arts

Indiana Academic Standards: Grades 11-12 English/Language Arts

2023 · Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) · retrieved 2026-07-13

Indiana is not a Common Core state — it repealed its adoption in 2014 and writes its own ELA standards. These codes are Indiana's, and do not match Common Core's.

Read the source document →
  • 11-12.CC.8

    Covered
    Analyze the impact of the media on the public, including identifying and analyzing rhetorical and logical fallacies.

    Covered by

    • · Ep 1 · Reading a Coffee Ad
    • · Ep 3 · Reading a Chocolate Ad
    • · Ep 8 · Reading a Craft Beer Label
    • · Ep 15 · Torches of Freedom
    • · Ep 16 · Reefer Madness and the Language of Fear
    • · Ep 18 · Just Say No
    • · Spotting Misleading Marketing, Lesson 8 · Misleading statistics and charts
    • · Spotting Misleading Marketing, Lesson 4 · Fake urgency, fake scarcity, and fake discounts

    Note: A media-literacy lesson recurs in every single episode of the BVC series, and the marketing course adds the consumer-protection half: named persuasion tactics, cherry-picked statistics, and truncated charts.

  • 11-12.RC.9

    Partially covered
    Synthesize and evaluate multiple sources of information presented in different mediums in order to address a question or solve a problem.

    Covered by

    • · Ep 10 · The Oral History That Survived (recovering Nathan “Nearest” Green's erased role)
    • · Ep 1 · Assignment, all four options are 2-3 week research projects requiring synthesis across sources

    What we do and don't cover: Partial: the skill is modelled throughout, but the student is required to perform it only in the Coffee episode's project.

  • 11-12.W.1

    Partially covered
    Write arguments in a variety of forms that: a. Introduce precise claim(s), establish the significance of the claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that logically sequences claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. b. Use rhetorical strategies to enhance the effectiveness of the claim. c. Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both in a manner that anticipates the audience's knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases. d. Use effective and varied transitions as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships between claim(s) and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claim(s) and counterclaims. e. Establish and maintain a consistent style and tone appropriate for the purpose and audience. f. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows and supports the argument presented.

    Covered by

    • · Ep 1 · Assignment, Option D, a 1,200-1,500 word research paper with a required counterargument section

    What we do and don't cover: Partial: the Coffee project's Option D asks for exactly this (a thesis, primary sources, and a counterargument section addressing the strongest objection). But it is ONE optional project in ONE episode — this is not yet a writing programme, and we will not claim it is.

  • 11-12.W.5

    Partially covered
    Conduct more sustained research assignments and tasks to build knowledge about the research process and the topic understudy. a. Formulate an inquiry question and refine and narrow the focus as research evolves. b. Gather relevant information from multiple types of authoritative sources, using advanced searches effectively, and annotate sources. c. Assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the task, purpose, and audience. d. Synthesize and integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas. e. Avoid plagiarism and over reliance on any one source and follow a standard format (e.g., MLA, APA) for citation. f. Present information, choosing from a variety of formats.

    Covered by

    • · Ep 1 · Assignment, Option B, climate-vulnerability report, 3+ peer-reviewed sources, APA bibliography
    • · Ep 1 · Assignment, Option D, primary-source research paper with an APA bibliography

    What we do and don't cover: Partial, same reason: the project demands a real research process with APA citation, but only the Coffee episode currently ships one.

What we don't claim

A standards page is only worth reading if the omissions are honest too. We looked at these and left them out:

  • Mathematics — nothing. This catalog does no mathematics instruction, so it meets no Indiana mathematics standard.
  • Science — almost nothing. There is no laboratory work, no investigation and no scientific modelling here. Indiana is not an NGSS state; we checked and claim no Indiana science standard. (Our one partial NGSS claim is for Washington, D.C., where NGSS applies.)
  • Most of the U.S. Government standards we checked. USG.1.4 (types of government: monarchy, oligarchy, totalitarianism, anarchy), USG.1.5 (unitary vs confederate vs federal), USG.1.6 (constitutionalism, rule of law, limited government, popular sovereignty as named principles), USG.2.2 (compromise at the Constitutional Convention), USG.2.4-2.6 (founding ideas, civic identity, and civic values as a set), USG.3.1 (the four-part characterization of U.S. government), USG.3.3 (enumerated/implied/DENIED powers in BOTH constitutions — our course teaches enumerated/implied/reserved/concurrent, U.S. only), USG.3.9 (Benjamin Harrison), USG.3.10 (political parties' progression and ideologies), USG.3.13 (media influence on public opinion — our media-literacy course is consumer protection, not political media analysis), all of USG.4 (foreign affairs), and USG.5.8 — the courses do not genuinely teach these, so we do not claim them.
  • Indiana Economics has no standard on unions. We checked the 2026 Economics document (and the 2023 edition) for the labor-history courses: Indiana's Economics standards contain no standard on labor unions or collective bargaining, so we cite none. The absence is in the standards, not the lessons.
  • USH.8.6 (deindustrialization) for the unions course. The History of Unions reads union decline honestly (PATCO, automation vs. trade) but does not teach the causes and consequences of deindustrialization as such. Close, but not the standard.
  • PE performance standards — all of them. Every indicator that asks a student to DEMONSTRATE motor skill, participate, or exhibit behavior during physical activity (all of Standard 1, the participation indicators of Standard 3, and Standard 4's etiquette-in-play) is out of reach of an online course, however good its knowledge content. We claim knowledge-side indicators only.
  • Health standards for the marketing course beyond HS.3.1. HS.2.3 (evaluate the effect of media and social media on health behaviors) was considered: Spotting Misleading Marketing evaluates marketing claims about health products, which is HS.3.1's skill, not an analysis of media's effect on health behavior. We claim the one that fits.
  • The AI-literacy ladder, the language courses, and Learning How to Learn — deferred, not denied. Indiana's closest frameworks (K-12 Computer Science, World Languages, Employability Skills) have not been fetched and verified yet. Our rule is fetch-or-don't-cite, so these courses carry no Indiana claims this pass. They are queued for a later mapping pass.
  • E.4.1, E.4.2, E.3.2, USH.9.3 — the Commodity Map rejections, still rejected. Public goods are never taught; corrective (Pigouvian) taxation is never taught as a policy tool; the four market structures are named, never taught as a unit; and “media in the democratic process” is too thin to stand up. See the source file for the full reasoning.

See it for yourself

Don't take the mapping on trust. Open the lesson and check it against the standard. Every course publishes its sources too.