Skip to content

Better Vice Club

Oklahoma standards alignment

Designed for high school. Below is every Oklahomastandard these courses cover: the exact code, the standard's own words, and the lesson that covers it. Where we only cover part of a standard, it says so, and says which part.

3
standards mapped
2
fully covered
1
partially covered
2
frameworks

Read this before you rely on it

  • We mapped this ourselves. This alignment was done by Better Vice Club against the published standards. It has not been reviewed, endorsed, or approved by Oklahoma's education authority or by anyone else.
  • Every code was fetched, then transcribed word for word. Each framework below shows the date its codes and text were retrieved from the publisher.
  • Standards get revised.A code can be renumbered or its wording changed without notice, and some states publish more than one live edition of the same document. Confirm anything you file against your own jurisdiction's current requirements, using the source links below.
  • We would rather claim less. Where the courses only partly cover a standard, this page says partially covered and explains the gap. Standards we considered and could not honestly claim are listed at the bottom, with the reasons.
Filtering by course: BVC: Kava — The Root of Peace

Showing 3 standards covered by BVC: Kava — The Root of Peace. Clear filters

Oklahoma · Social Studies

Oklahoma Academic Standards for Social Studies — World History (WH)

Oklahoma Academic Standards for Social Studies · adopted 2019 · World History · Oklahoma State Department of Education (OSDE) · retrieved 2026-07-19

Oklahoma's high-school World History course. The colonial, imperial, commodity-trade, and Cold-War content of the BVC Commodity Map and the labor-history catalog maps onto its Global-Age, revolutions-and-imperialism, and post-war strands. Transcribed verbatim from the OSDE 2019 Social Studies Standards.

Read the source document →

Oklahoma · Social Studies

Oklahoma Academic Standards for Social Studies — World Human Geography (WG)

Oklahoma Academic Standards for Social Studies · adopted 2019 · World Human Geography · Oklahoma State Department of Education (OSDE) · retrieved 2026-07-19

Oklahoma's high-school World Human Geography course. The Great Migration and the BVC growing-belts/agricultural-diffusion content map onto its migration and agricultural-land-use strands. Transcribed verbatim from the OSDE 2019 Social Studies Standards.

Read the source document →

What we don't claim

A standards page is only worth reading if the omissions are honest too. We looked at these and left them out:

  • Mathematics — nothing. This catalog does no mathematics instruction, so it meets no Oklahoma Academic Standards mathematics standard.
  • English Language Arts — deferred, not denied (fetch-or-don't-cite). Oklahoma repealed its Common Core adoption in 2014 and writes its own Oklahoma Academic Standards for ELA. The catalog's media-literacy, source-evaluation, and BVC rhetoric work WOULD map to the OAS ELA reading-informational and writing strands, as it does to other states' ELA standards. But we have not yet fetched and verified the OAS ELA document, and our rule is fetch-or-don't-cite, so Oklahoma carries no ELA claims this pass.
  • Science — deferred, and NOT a blind NGSS alias. Oklahoma's science standards (adopted 2020) are Oklahoma's own — NGSS-influenced but not verbatim NGSS — so our shared NGSS file does not apply and we will not alias it. The one Earth-science-adjacent claim other states hang on HS-ESS3-1 (climate and resource availability shaping human activity) is deferred until the OAS Science document is fetched and its wording verified against Oklahoma's own codes. There is no laboratory work, investigation, or modelling in this catalog either way.
  • USG.6 — the public-policy-formation strand. USG.6.1–6.4 (the federal budget process, fiscal and monetary policy, and the formulation of domestic and foreign policy, national defense, and participation in international organizations) are not genuinely taught by these courses.
  • USG.5.4 — political parties, interest groups, and media. USG.5.4 analyzes the role of political parties, interest groups, mass media, public opinion, and campaign funding in the political process. Our media-literacy course is consumer protection, not political-media analysis, and we do not teach parties, interest groups, or public opinion as named content — so we do not claim it. (How-to-Help-a-Campaign's coverage of the legal guardrails on campaign money is a thin, one-sided overlap we will not stretch into this standard.)
  • The USG foundations and federalism standards we checked and rejected. USG.1.1/1.2 (limited vs. unlimited governments), USG.1.4 (the role of government in market vs. command systems), USG.2.1 (the Magna Carta, Mayflower Compact, and English Bill of Rights as founding documents — our Constitution course starts from the Articles of Confederation, not these), USG.2.2 (inalienable rights and the Declaration's grievances as named content), USG.2.4 (the Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalists as texts), USG.3.5 (how the Commerce Clause established the constitutional relationship with Indian tribes — the flagship teaches tribal sovereignty and McGirt, which we DO claim via USG.3.4, but not the Commerce Clause's specific role in tribal relations), and USG.3.8 (popular sovereignty and majority rule vs. minority rights as named concepts) — the courses do not genuinely teach these.
  • Oklahoma's economic-systems standard has no home for the reciprocity economy. The curriculum contrasts traditional (reciprocity) and market economies directly and at length, but Oklahoma's E.2.1 compares MARKET, COMMAND, and MIXED systems — it does not name traditional or reciprocity economies, and we do not teach command economies. So, as in Arizona and California, the reciprocity-vs-market content has no economic-systems standard to meet. The gap is in the standards, not the lessons.
  • Most of the Economics, USH, WH, and WG strands. Oklahoma's Economics course is overwhelmingly personal finance and macroeconomics (money supply, banking, interest rates, GDP, the Federal Reserve — E.1, E.2.2–E.2.5, E.4–E.13), which this catalog does not teach. Across United States History, World History, and World Human Geography we claim only the strands with genuine lesson evidence (named in the frameworks above) and leave the many strands the catalog does not cover — the World Wars, the New Deal's named agencies, the Middle East and China strands, the industrialization-and-development geography strands, and the rest — unclaimed. Oklahoma History (OKH), Psychology, and Sociology are not claimed at all.
  • Oklahoma's own state structure is taught more fully than any one code captures. Oklahoma Civics teaches the two courts of last resort (the civil Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals — a feature shared only with Texas), the large plural executive and the elected Corporation Commission, the 101/48-member Legislature with term limits, Oklahoma's first-in-the-nation constitutional initiative and referendum, merit selection with retention, and 38+ sovereign tribal nations — from Oklahoma's own sources. Oklahoma's USG course has no dedicated state-structure standard, so USG.3.3 (relationships and responsibilities among the levels of government) and USG.3.4 (tribal sovereignty) are the generous homes we cite this content under; the split top bench, the plural executive, and the direct-democracy 'first' have no USG code of their OWN, and the elected Corporation Commission is not separately citable.

See it for yourself

Don't take the mapping on trust. Open the lesson and check it against the standard. Every course publishes its sources too.

Browse the coursesPick a different state