Skip to content

Better Vice Club

Iowa standards alignment

Designed for high school. Below is every Iowastandard these courses cover: the exact code, the standard's own words, and the lesson that covers it. Where we only cover part of a standard, it says so, and says which part.

6
standards mapped
3
fully covered
3
partially covered
2
frameworks

Read this before you rely on it

  • We mapped this ourselves. This alignment was done by Better Vice Club against the published standards. It has not been reviewed, endorsed, or approved by Iowa's education authority or by anyone else.
  • Every code was fetched, then transcribed word for word. Each framework below shows the date its codes and text were retrieved from the publisher.
  • Standards get revised.A code can be renumbered or its wording changed without notice, and some states publish more than one live edition of the same document. Confirm anything you file against your own jurisdiction's current requirements, using the source links below.
  • We would rather claim less. Where the courses only partly cover a standard, this page says partially covered and explains the gap. Standards we considered and could not honestly claim are listed at the bottom, with the reasons.

Subject

Filtering by course: BVC: Psychedelics — The Mushroom's Message

Showing 6 standards covered by BVC: Psychedelics — The Mushroom's Message. Clear filters

Iowa · Social Studies

Iowa Academic Standards for Social Studies (January 2026) — High School Civics/Government and Inquiry

Iowa Academic Standards for Social Studies (January 2026) · High School Civics/Government (SS.9-12.Gov) and High School Inquiry (SS.9-12) standards · Iowa Department of Education / State Board of Education · retrieved 2026-07-19

Iowa writes its own social studies standards (C3-informed, not Common Core). The High School Civics/Government course is the anchor for the Iowa Civics flagship: SS.9-12.Gov.18 (the government of the State of Iowa), SS.9-12.Gov.20 (Iowa's local governments), and SS.9-12.Gov.13 (the electoral process and Iowa election law) are near-1:1 with the flagship's own-structure, local-government, caucus, redistricting, and voting lessons, and the federal branch/federalism/citizenship benchmarks carry the general civics ladder. The High School Inquiry strand's source-evaluation anchors (SS.9-12.3, SS.9-12.4) carry the catalog's media/source-literacy method. Transcribed verbatim from the Iowa DOE's January 2026 standards (see the file header for provenance). The coded text is the anchor-standard sentence; the document's Must-include/May-include clarifications are examples, not the standard.

Read the source document →
  • SS.9-12.3

    Covered
    Gather relevant information from multiple sources representing a wide range of views while using the origin, authority, structure, context, and corroborative value of the sources to guide the selection.

    Covered by

    • · Ep 19 · Peer Review Versus Press Release
    • · Every course's Sources bibliography, with per-claim verification
    • · Ep 4 · Whose Voice Tells the Story, Beckford (1790) against Equiano (1789) and Mary Prince (1831) on the same plantation world
    • · Ep 3 · Two Ways of Seeing a Bean
    • · Ep 5 · Two Ways of Knowing
    • · Ep 18 · Whose Voice
    • · Ep 1 · Assignment, Option B, 3+ peer-reviewed sources and an APA bibliography
    • · Ep 1 · Assignment, Option C, interview ethics: informed consent, right to review

    Note: Gathering from multiple sources and weighing each by origin, authority, context, and corroboration — the standard's exact skill — is the source-evaluation method run across the catalog, with a checkable bibliography published each time.

  • SS.9-12.4

    Covered
    Evaluate the purpose and credibility of sources by examining how experts view the source.

    Covered by

    • · Ep 19 · Peer Review Versus Press Release
    • · Every course's Sources bibliography, with per-claim verification
    • · Ep 1 · Reading a Coffee Ad
    • · Ep 2 · Reading a Tea Ad
    • · Ep 3 · Reading a Chocolate Ad
    • · Ep 4 · Whose Voice Tells the Story (reading a text for what it leaves out)
    • · Ep 11 · Tiki and the Tropical Paradise
    • · Ep 15 · The Language of Doubt
    • · Ep 15 · Doubt Is Our Product
    • · Ep 20 · The Ban Against the Evidence (the UK banning khat against its own scientific advice)
    • · Spotting Misleading Marketing, Lesson 8 · Misleading statistics and charts
    • · Spotting Misleading Marketing, Lesson 4 · Fake urgency, fake scarcity, and fake discounts

    Note: Near-1:1 with the catalog's method: the standard's clarification (purpose taxonomy — inform/persuade/sell/propaganda — lateral reading, and filter bubbles) is the media-literacy skill run in every episode, reading each source and message for credibility, bias, and omission.

  • SS.9-12.5

    Partially covered
    Refine claims and counterclaims that are supported with relevant, credible evidence gathered through research and investigation.

    Covered by

    • · Ep 15 · Doubt Is Our Product
    • · Ep 19 · Peer Review Versus Press Release
    • · Ep 20 · The Ban Against the Evidence (the UK banning khat against its own scientific advice)
    • · Ep 1 · Assignment, Option D, a 1,200-1,500 word research paper with a required counterargument section

    What we do and don't cover: Evaluating claims and their evidence is taught throughout; a refined claim-and-counterclaim product supported by researched evidence ships as a graded assignment only in the Coffee episode, so this is partial.

  • SS.9-12.8

    Partially covered
    Apply a range of deliberative and democratic strategies and procedures to make decisions and engage in their classrooms, schools, and communities.

    Covered by

    • · US, State & Local Government, Lesson 8 · Where to show up and be heard, at every level
    • · Iowa Civics, Lesson 4 · How a bill becomes law, local government, and getting involved
    • · Ep 15 · Doubt Is Our Product
    • · Ep 19 · Peer Review Versus Press Release
    • · Ep 20 · The Ban Against the Evidence (the UK banning khat against its own scientific advice)

    What we do and don't cover: The standard's civic-engagement clarification (a healthy news diet of multiple credible sources, the impact of misinformation, and showing up where issues are decided) is taught as practice — Iowa's own levers (caucus, county boards, contacting Des Moines legislators, running locally); the designed graded deliberation is prompted, not run as an assignment, so this is partial.

Iowa · English/Language Arts

Iowa Academic Standards for English Language Arts (2024) — Literacy in History/Social Studies and Writing, Grades 11-12

Iowa Academic Standards for English Language Arts (State Board of Education, June 20, 2024) · Reading for Literacy in History/Social Studies (RH), Reading Informational Text (RI), and Writing for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science & Technical Subjects (WHST), grades 11-12 · Iowa Department of Education / State Board of Education · retrieved 2026-07-19

Iowa adopted the Common Core for ELA as the Iowa Core, but its current (2024) standards revised some codes, so these are transcribed VERBATIM from Iowa's own document rather than aliased to the shared Common Core file. RH.11-12.6, RH.11-12.8, and RH.11-12.9 are identical to Common Core; RI.11-12.6 and WHST.11-12.8 are Iowa's revised wording (see the file header). We claim no mathematics standards.

Read the source document →
  • RH.11-12.8

    Covered
    Evaluate an author's premises, claims, and evidence by corroborating or challenging them with other information.

    Covered by

    • · Ep 15 · Doubt Is Our Product
    • · Ep 19 · Peer Review Versus Press Release
    • · Ep 20 · The Ban Against the Evidence (the UK banning khat against its own scientific advice)

    Note: Iowa's text is verbatim identical to the Common Core code.

  • WHST.11-12.8

    Partially covered
    Gather relevant information from multiple credible primary and secondary print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the specific task, purpose, and audience, including recognition of bias; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and overreliance on any one source and following a standard format for citation.

    Covered by

    • · Ep 1 · Assignment, Option B, 3+ peer-reviewed sources and an APA bibliography
    • · Ep 1 · Assignment, Option C, interview ethics: informed consent, right to review
    • · Ep 19 · Peer Review Versus Press Release
    • · Every course's Sources bibliography, with per-claim verification

    What we do and don't cover: IOWA-REVISED wording: Iowa says “multiple credible primary and secondary print and digital sources… including recognition of bias,” where the Common Core reads “multiple authoritative… sources” without the bias clause. The bias clause maps well to the catalog's source-evaluation method; the graded gathering-and-citing product ships only in the Coffee episode, so this is partial. This divergence is why the shared Common Core file is not aliased here.

What we don't claim

A standards page is only worth reading if the omissions are honest too. We looked at these and left them out:

  • Mathematics — Common Core adopted as the Iowa Core: nothing claimed. Iowa adopted the Common Core State Standards for mathematics as the Iowa Core, but this catalog does no mathematics instruction, so it meets no Iowa mathematics standard. One nuance: Iowa's own Civics/Government standard SS.9-12.Gov.13 cross-references two statistics codes — A1.S-ID.C.9 (“Distinguish between correlation and causation”) and ST.S-IC.B.6 (“Evaluate reports based on data”) — that lightly touch the catalog's misleading-statistics media literacy. But the catalog does no mathematics instruction and does not run the statistical analysis those codes require, so we do not claim them.
  • Science — NGSS-BASED (Iowa was a 2015 Lead State) but with documented Iowa revisions: deferred. Iowa's State Board of Education adopted the Next Generation Science Standards in August 2015, having helped write them as a Lead State Partner. But Iowa's science standards have documented later revisions (notably to climate-related expectations), so — unlike Michigan, which adopted the NGSS verbatim and reuses the shared NGSS mapping — we could not confirm within this pass that Iowa's HS-ESS3-1 (the one climate/resource expectation this catalog could touch) is a byte-for-byte NGSS republication. Our rule is verbatim-or-nothing, so we do NOT alias the shared NGSS framework here and DEFER Iowa's science standards rather than cite text we have not cleanly verified. The catalog's climate/resource content (resources, hazards, and climate shaping human activity) would map to Iowa's Earth and Space Science standards; that is deferred, not denied.
  • English/Language Arts — Common-Core-derived but Iowa revised, so NOT aliased. Iowa adopted the Common Core for ELA as the Iowa Core, but the current (2024) Iowa Academic Standards for English Language Arts revised some codes. Of the six literacy codes this catalog touches, RH.11-12.6/8/9 are verbatim identical to the shared Common Core file, but RI.11-12.6 (“…or artistry of the text” vs Common Core's “…or beauty of the text”) and WHST.11-12.8 (“multiple credible primary and secondary… including recognition of bias” vs Common Core's “multiple authoritative… sources”) are Iowa's own revised wording. Because two of the six diverge, we do not alias the shared Common Core ELA framework — that would misrepresent Iowa's revised codes as verbatim Common Core. We instead transcribe Iowa's own verbatim literacy standards in the ia-literacy framework above.
  • Iowa's caucuses, nonpartisan redistricting, and Missouri-Plan judiciary have no discrete benchmark. The flagship teaches the Iowa Caucuses, Iowa's nonpartisan Legislative Services Agency redistricting, and its merit-selection-plus-retention judiciary as headline features. The Iowa Caucuses are named only in the clarification of SS.9-12.Gov.13, and redistricting/gerrymandering appear only in that standard's “May include” list; the Missouri-Plan judiciary sits inside SS.9-12.Gov.18 (the state government) rather than as a benchmark of its own. So they are claimed through Gov.13 and Gov.18 rather than as standards in their own right.
  • The sovereign Meskwaki Nation tribal government (SS.9-12.Gov.19). Iowa's Civics/Government course carries a dedicated benchmark on the sovereign Meskwaki Nation's tribal government — the Meskwaki Tribal Constitution, Council, and Court, and the Settlement's status as privately purchased land rather than a federal reservation. Iowa Civics teaches Iowa's state and local structure but not tribal government, so SS.9-12.Gov.19 is not claimed. The gap is in the course, not the standards.
  • The political-science and civic-virtue benchmarks we checked and rejected. SS.9-12.Gov.1 (origins of government and alternative systems, including crimes against humanity by communist regimes), SS.9-12.Gov.2 (Enlightenment philosophers and the Federalist/Anti-Federalist Papers as named content), SS.9-12.Gov.5 (government's role in maintaining order through safety/morality/health laws), SS.9-12.Gov.11 (patterns of political action and activism), SS.9-12.Gov.12 (intermediary institutions — interest groups, parties, media, campaigns, political socialization), SS.9-12.Gov.15 (biographies of exemplary Iowans and Americans who promoted civic virtue), SS.9-12.Gov.16 (civic virtue as a named concept), and the inquiry-mechanics anchors SS.9-12.1, SS.9-12.2, and SS.9-12.6 (developing compelling/supporting questions and constructing sequenced responses) — the courses do not genuinely teach these, or teach them too thinly to claim, so we do not claim them.

See it for yourself

Don't take the mapping on trust. Open the lesson and check it against the standard. Every course publishes its sources too.