Minnesota standards alignment

• 9.1.1.3

  Covered

  Curate and evaluate various sources of information and forms of political persuasion, including digital, for validity, accuracy, ideology, emotional appeals, bias and prejudice.

  Covered by

  • BVC: Psychedelics — The Mushroom's Message
  • BVC: Coffee — The Daily Global Connection
  • BVC: Tea — The Way of Tea
  • BVC: Chocolate — Food of the Gods
  • BVC: Sugar — The Sweet Revolution
  • BVC: Rum — Sweet Poison
  • BVC: Tobacco — Sacred Smoke
  • BVC: Beer — Liquid Bread
  • BVC: Cannabis — The Green Revolution
  • BVC: Coca — White Lines
  • BVC: Khat — The Afternoon Leaf

  • · Ep 19 · Peer Review Versus Press Release
  • · Every course's Sources bibliography, with per-claim verification
  • · Ep 1 · Reading a Coffee Ad
  • · Ep 2 · Reading a Tea Ad
  • · Ep 3 · Reading a Chocolate Ad
  • · Ep 4 · Whose Voice Tells the Story (reading a text for what it leaves out)
  • · Ep 11 · Tiki and the Tropical Paradise
  • · Ep 15 · The Language of Doubt
  • · Ep 8 · Reading a Craft Beer Label
  • · Ep 15 · Torches of Freedom
  • · Ep 16 · Reefer Madness and the Language of Fear
  • · Ep 18 · Just Say No
  • · Ep 15 · Doubt Is Our Product
  • · Ep 20 · The Ban Against the Evidence (the UK banning khat against its own scientific advice)
  • · Spotting Misleading Marketing, Lesson 8 · Misleading statistics and charts
  • · Spotting Misleading Marketing, Lesson 4 · Fake urgency, fake scarcity, and fake discounts

  Note: Reading each source and message for validity, bias, emotional appeal, and logical fallacy — the standard's exact skill — is the media-literacy method run across the catalog: ads, labels, and campaign language read for what they leave out.

What we don't claim

A standards page is only worth reading if the omissions are honest too. We looked at these and left them out:

• Mathematics — Minnesota's OWN standards (NOT the Common Core): nothing claimed. Minnesota is one of the few states that did NOT adopt the Common Core for mathematics; it kept its own Minnesota Academic Standards in Mathematics. Either way, this catalog does no mathematics instruction, so it meets no Minnesota mathematics benchmark.
• English/Language Arts — Common Core adopted in 2010, since REPLACED by Minnesota's own 2020 standards: deferred. Minnesota adopted the Common Core State Standards for English language arts in their entirety in 2010 (adopted into rule in 2011, implemented 2012-13) — a genuine Common Core ELA state. Since then Minnesota has REPLACED them with its own 2020 Minnesota Academic Standards in English Language Arts (adopted 2023, fully implemented 2025-26), which re-home literacy as "disciplinary literacies" including a discrete "Literacy in History/Social Studies" section for grades 6-12. Because the CURRENT Minnesota ELA standards are no longer a verbatim republication of the Common Core, we do NOT alias the shared Common Core ELA framework here — that would cite superseded standards. The catalog's ELA-literacy strengths (evaluating an author's point of view and evidence, analyzing rhetoric, sustained research with citation) would map to Minnesota's 2020 "Literacy in History/Social Studies" standards, but transcribing and verifying those verbatim is deferred this pass. Note: the media/source-evaluation skill is already claimed, as a full alignment, through the Citizenship and Government benchmark 9.1.1.3.
• Science — Minnesota's OWN 2019 standards (NGSS-influenced, not the NGSS): deferred. Minnesota adopted its own 2019 Minnesota Academic Standards in Science, which are influenced by but are NOT a verbatim adoption of the Next Generation Science Standards, so the shared NGSS mapping this catalog uses in NGSS states does not apply in Minnesota. The catalog's climate/resource content (resources, hazards, and climate shaping human activity) would find an analog in Minnesota's Earth/environmental science benchmarks, but this pass mapped only the Citizenship and Government strand; Minnesota's science benchmarks are deferred (verbatim-or-nothing), not claimed unverified.
• Tribal Nations (Anchor Standard Six, and the Tribal clauses of 9.1.4.7). Minnesota's Citizenship and Government strand has an entire Tribal Nations anchor standard (9.1.6.1-9.1.6.4) and threads Tribal governments through 9.1.4.7. Minnesota Civics teaches Minnesota's state and local structure but not the governments of Minnesota's eleven Tribal Nations, so 9.1.4.7 is claimed as partial and the Anchor Standard Six benchmarks are not claimed. The gap is in the course, not the standards.
• Minnesota's DFL and nonpartisan-Legislature distinctives lack a discrete party benchmark. The flagship teaches the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party and the 60-year (1913-1973) nonpartisan Legislature as headline Minnesota features. The Citizenship and Government strand's closest benchmark is 9.1.5.1 (the impact of political parties on elections and public policy), which the course does not otherwise satisfy, so those specifics are claimed only through 9.1.4.7 (the powers and operations of Minnesota government) rather than as a parties standard of their own. The high-turnout / same-day-registration signature IS claimed squarely, through 9.1.1.2 (how access to voting is impacted by law).
• The founding-philosophy, rights-of-the-accused-at-trial, budget, foreign-policy, and public-opinion benchmarks we checked and rejected. 9.1.2.1 (the founding-era natural-rights and social-contract philosophy as a named unit), 9.1.2.2 (the significance of democratic values to processes/elections as an abstraction), 9.1.2.3 (the individual-rights vs. general-welfare, majority vs. minority, and liberty vs. equality tensions), 9.1.3.4 (the rights of the accused at trial under the Sixth and Eighth Amendments), 9.1.3.5 (due process and equal protection under the 14th Amendment as civil-rights jurisprudence), 9.1.4.6 (the purposes, types and sources of laws and rules as a taxonomy), 9.1.4.9 (comparing the U.S. and Minnesota budgets), 9.1.4.10 / 9.1.4.11 (influencing U.S. foreign policy and the role of international law), and 9.1.5.1 / 9.1.5.2 (political parties, interest groups, media, and public opinion shaping public policy) — the courses do not genuinely teach these, or teach them too thinly to claim, so we do not claim them.